Skip to main content
· 7/15/1981

Stephen J. Harbulak v. County of Suffolk

Citations

  • 654 F.2d 194
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that attorneys “cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro se parties”
  • noting that the plaintiff “is a lawyer and, therefore, he cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro se parties”
  • finding that a practicing lawyer is not entitled to liberal construction
  • finding that a practicing lawyer is not entitled to liberal construction
  • finding pro se attorneys typically “cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro Se parties”
  • finding pro se attorneys typically “cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro se parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Oakes, Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.