· 7/15/1981
Stephen J. Harbulak v. County of Suffolk
Citations
- 654 F.2d 194
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that attorneys “cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro se parties”
- noting that the plaintiff “is a lawyer and, therefore, he cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro se parties”
- finding that a practicing lawyer is not entitled to liberal construction
- finding that a practicing lawyer is not entitled to liberal construction
- finding pro se attorneys typically “cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro Se parties”
- finding pro se attorneys typically “cannot claim the special consideration which the courts customarily grant to pro se parties”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumbard, Oakes, Pollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.