· 9/9/1994
Stephen I. ADLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael ESPY, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 35 F.3d 263
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24319
- 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,392
- 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1342
- 1994 WL 484937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Considering that the administrative route is entirely optional with the complainant, this seems an awfully harsh sanction.... ”
- remanding lower court decision requiring administrative exhaustion where plaintiffs EEOC complaint was dismissed, pursuant to a regulation, when he filed suit in civil court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.