Skip to main content
· 9/9/1994

Stephen I. ADLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael ESPY, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 263
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24319
  • 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,392
  • 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1342
  • 1994 WL 484937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Considering that the administrative route is entirely optional with the complainant, this seems an awfully harsh sanction.... ”
  • remanding lower court decision requiring administrative exhaustion where plaintiffs EEOC complaint was dismissed, pursuant to a regulation, when he filed suit in civil court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.