Stephen and Cheryl Jacoby v. The Hamptons Community Association, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an involuntary commitment order that has since expired is not moot because of adverse consequences attended to future involuntary commitment proceedings
• holding that an appeal of an involuntary commitment which has lapsed is not moot because the commitment “may have adverse consequences on future involuntary commitment determinations”
• holding that release from detention does not render an appeal moot where collateral consequences, such as the consideration of the commitment order at future commitment hearings, result from the detention
• recognizing that an order of involuntary commitment may be evidence in a subsequent commitment proceeding, and therefore \[a]n individual's release from [involuntary] detention does not render an appeal moot\
• recognizing that an order of involuntary commitment may be evidence in a subsequent commitment proceeding, and therefore \[a]n individual's release from [involuntary] detention does not render an appeal moot\
• holding that because involuntary commitment orders may have consequences for future commitment decisions, an appeal of such an order is not moot even if the detention at issue has ended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).