Stephen A. Kelley, Jr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reach appellant’s argument concerning VE testimony “because he did not raise it before the administrative agency or the district court”
• declining to address an issue not “raise[d] . . . before the administrative agency or the district court”
• treating as waived a challenge to the administrative law judge’s reliance on the testimony of a vocational expert that was “not raise[d] ... before the administrative agency or the district, court”
• treating as waived a challenge to the administrative law judge’s reliance on the testimony of a vocational expert that was ‘not raise[d] □□ . before the administrative agency or the district court’
• treating as waived a challenge to the administrative court] must…tak[e] into account evidence favorable as well as unfavorable to the [Commissioner’s] decision.” Chester v. Bowen, 792 F.2d 129, 131 (11th Cir. 1986
• treating as waived a challenge to the administrative law judge’s reliance on the testimony of a vocational expert that was ‘not raise[d] . . . before the administrative agency or the district court’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).