Stephany A. Connelly v. The Main Street America Group
Syllabus
The Court reverses the decision of the court of appeals, finding the phrase \legally entitled to recover\ in the uninsured motorist (UM) statute is unambiguous and requires an injured plaintiff to first secure a judgment against the at-fault driver before filing for UM benefits. Due to the tort immunity afforded employers and co-employees by the Workers' Compensation Act, the plaintiff here will never be legally entitled to recover against the at-fault driver (her co-employee), and, therefore, she is not entitled to UM benefits.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.