Stephanie Waggoner v. Olin Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[i]n some jobs . . . working at home for a time might be an option” for a reasonable accommodation
• holding that regular attendance was an essential function
• holding \as a matter of law\ that employee's desire \to miss work whenever she felt she needed to and apparently for so long as she felt she needed to\ was not a reasonable accommodation for someone employed as a production worker
• denying a request for an accommodation for unlim ited time off by a production employee who was absent or tardy forty times in her 20-month tenure
• denying a request for an accommodation for unlimited time off by a production employee who was absent or tardy forty times in her 20 month tenure
• noting that “[tjhere are limits to how far an employer must go in granting leave” and holding request unreasonable because “[plaintiff] simply wanted to miss work whenever she felt she needed to and apparently for so long as she needed to”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).