Stephanie Michelle Morales v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officials must have a sufficient “personal stake” regarding the impact of a challenged law on third parties in order to have standing to challenge the law
• concluding that pursuant to the “collective-knowledge doctrine” “the ICE officer’s knowledge may be imputed to local officials even when those officials are unaware of the specific facts that establish probable cause of removability”
• noting that “the Tenth Amendment prevents Congress from com- pelling Texas municipalities to cooperate in immigration enforcement”
• stating that “[u]nder these [287(g)] agreements, state and local officials become de facto immigration officers, competent to act on their own initiative”
• stating that “[u]nder these [287(g)] agreements, state and local officials become de facto immigration officers, competent to act on their own initiative”
• holding “plaintiffs must establish that every seizure authorized by the ICE-detainer mandate violates the Fourth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).