Stephanie Leigh Quintanilla v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Supreme Court has “eschewed” a “direct/collateral consequence categorization scheme to decide ineffective assistance of counsel claims” and is “in favor of directly applying Strickland to the plea context” (citing Hill, 474 U.S. at 57–60)
• young age — 15 and 16 years, and rebanee on counsel increased counsels’ duty to make certain defendants knew of all the risks associated with a guilty plea and waiver of right to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).