Stephanie Beckel v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that applying equitable estoppel to a threat to fire an employee if he sued would “distort the doctrine of equitable estoppel” as well as “circumvent the limitations that Title VII imposes on suits for retaliation”
• suggesting that an employer's threat to fire an employee if she sued for sexual harassment was “a form of anticipatory retaliation, actionable as retaliation under Title VII”
• threatening an employee with termination if she sued might be a form of retaliation
• “Such a threat would be a form of anticipatory retaliation, actionable as retaliation under Title VII.”
• “Such a threat would be a form of anticipatory retaliation, actionable as retaliation under Title VII.”
• “Such a threat would be a form of anticipatory retaliation, actionable as retaliation under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).