Skip to main content
· 9/15/2003

Stephane Moreau v. Air France Joseph P. Bouloux Howard Weisser v. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee

Citations

  • 343 F.3d 1179
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8421
  • 8 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1806
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10531
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18999
  • 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,484
  • 2003 WL 22119719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that checking employment records to ensure company standards were met was insufficient support for a finding that a company was an employer
  • noting that the FMLA “does not contain any language specifically addressing the joint employment concept”
  • relying primarily on the Ninth Circuit's own decisions in Bonnette and Torres-Lopez
  • noting that, although the putative joint employer provided “some equipment, such as the food trays and baggage pallets” to the plaintiff ground workers, this was outweighed by the fact that the “work was primarily performed on the premises of the ground handling companies”
  • relying primarily on the Ninth Circuit’s own decisions in Bonnette and Torres-Lopez

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Nelson, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.