· 4/27/1990
Stennet v. State
Citations
- 564 So. 2d 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when counsel failed to specify which subsection of assault statute on which he wanted court to charge, he did not properly preserve issue for review
- “ ‘intent’ and ‘recklessness’ are incompatible terms”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tyson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.