Stenhouse v. Jacobson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a named insured was a necessary party to a lawsuit that sought to declare that the named insured had no interest in the policy
• explaining that, where the interest of the party to be added appears to be adverse to that of the plaintiff, the “new” party should be added as a defendant rather than as an involuntary plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).