Skip to main content
· 2/19/1985

Stemmer v. Estate of Sarazin

Citations

  • 362 N.W.2d 406
  • 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 3865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that quantum meruit “is used only when failure to do so would result in unjust enrichment”
  • holding that equitable doctrines of relief did not apply where there was “no mutual intention to contract so as to warrant fashioning a contract implied in fact” and where actor “made no promises to [claimant] which would have induced any action by them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Nierengarten, Randall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.