Skip to main content
· 10/30/2001

Stem v. England

Citations

  • 191 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22887
  • 2001 WL 1795161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • confirming alleged instance of discrimination occurred on international 7 flight and was therefore preempted
  • “It is improper for a moving party to introduce new facts or 4 different legal arguments in the reply brief than those presented in the moving papers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.