· 10/30/2001
Stem v. England
Citations
- 191 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22887
- 2001 WL 1795161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confirming alleged instance of discrimination occurred on international 7 flight and was therefore preempted
- “It is improper for a moving party to introduce new facts or 4 different legal arguments in the reply brief than those presented in the moving papers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.