Stellwagon v. Pyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Ljanguage employed in [judicial] opinions must be related to the issue decided; when it goes beyond that, it must be considered dictum”
• language employed in an opinion “must be related to the issue decided; when it goes beyond that, it must be considered dictum”
• Language employed in an opinion “must be related to the issue decided; when it goes beyond that, it must be considered dictum[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).