Stella v. Stella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the wife was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on her rule 1.530 motion for new trial which alleged that the husband committed fraud by misrepresenting the value of certain art objects at trial
• if proven, wife’s assertions that husband had testified that a statue was worth $100, while knowing that its true value was $35,000, would have changed the court’s equitable distribution and, thus, entitled wife to an eviden-tiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).