· 2/22/1984
Stella STATHOS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Russell E. BOWDEN, Et Al., Defendants, Appellants
Citations
- 728 F.2d 15
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25241
- 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,165
- 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing “doubt” that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine extends to conspiracy under § 1985(3)
- no plain error where “the jury’s question suggests no serious or prejudicial confusion”
- “We doubt that this ‘intracorporate’ exception should be read broadly. The cases employing it have rested in large part on precedent drawn from the antitrust field.”
- “We doubt that this ‘intracorporate’ exception should be read broadly. The cases employing it have rested in large part on precedent drawn from the antitrust field.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Breyer, Maletz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.