Skip to main content
· 2/22/1984

Stella STATHOS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Russell E. BOWDEN, Et Al., Defendants, Appellants

Citations

  • 728 F.2d 15
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25241
  • 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,165
  • 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressing “doubt” that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine extends to conspiracy under § 1985(3)
  • no plain error where “the jury’s question suggests no serious or prejudicial confusion”
  • “We doubt that this ‘intracorporate’ exception should be read broadly. The cases employing it have rested in large part on precedent drawn from the antitrust field.”
  • “We doubt that this ‘intracorporate’ exception should be read broadly. The cases employing it have rested in large part on precedent drawn from the antitrust field.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Breyer, Maletz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.