Stelco Holding Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the rule that a \defendant's face and body are physical evidence\ to reach the conclusion that it was \permissible for the prosecution to comment on the accused's physical appearance\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• applying the rule that a “defendant’s face and body are physical 8 evidence” to reach the conclusion that it was “permissible for the prosecution to 9 comment on the accused’s physical appearance” (internal quotation marks and 10 citation omitted)
• this court affirmed the defendant’s death sentence for the crimes of murder during a kidnapping and murder to escape detection
• defendant cited no specific facts from the record to support a particularized need to inspect the grand jury transcripts
• “Brady does not apply to materials that are not -15- ‘wholly within the control of the prosecution.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).