Steinway & Sons v. Massey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• regarding affirmative concealment that must be shown to toll a limitations period
• defendants’ proffered reasons for a price increase were “affirmative acts of concealment,” despite their accuracy, because “a portion of the announced price increase” was due to undisclosed “collusion with competitors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).