Steinhoff v. Sommerfelt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that appellant did not preserve contention first raised in a motion to alter or amend, where appellant also refused to specify whether appeal was taken from underlying judgment or from denial of motion to alter or amend
• determining that parties’ complaint that circuit court did not enter a QDRO was not preserved, because “[p]rior to filing his final Opinion and Order, [the judge] was never asked to consider the subject. There is before us, therefore, nothing preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).