Steinhauser v. Spraul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that records of cellular telephone calls immediately preceding a car accident were intrinsic to conduct charged, did not implicate Rule 404(b), and were admissible under Rule 403
• finding, under New Hampshire's version of the rule, phone records detailing a driver's phone conversations for thirty-seven minutes prior to fatal collision inextricably intertwined with negligent homicide charge
• finding that evidence of the defendant’s cell phone use during a thirty-seven minute car ride prior to a fatal collision with a pedestrian was intrinsic to the charge that the defendant was so distracted by her cell phone that she failed to avoid the victim
• “Where the trial court reaches the correct result on mistaken grounds, we will affirm if valid alternative grounds support the decision.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
• “Where the trial court reaches the correct result on mistaken grounds, we will affirm if valid alternative grounds support the decision.” (quotation omitted)
• “Where the trial court reaches the correct result on mistaken grounds, we will affirm if valid alternative grounds support the decision.” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).