Steinhauer v. Botsford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s statements that its data processing system would be capable of providing the plaintiff with sufficient information, and that it would be an effective and efficient tool used in inventory control were statements of present fact
• interpreting Minnesota law as holding “a general disclaimer clause is ineffective to negate reliance on even innocent misrepresentations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).