Skip to main content
· 5/27/2004

Steinhardt v. Potter

Citations

  • 326 F. Supp. 2d 449
  • 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1214
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9660
  • 2004 WL 1192082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “no language in the FMLA or in any judicial precedent that supports a finding of a right to a jury trial in FMLA actions against the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.