Steinhardt v. Consolidated Grocery Co.
Citations
- 80 Fla. 531
Syllabus
<p>1.. In an action for damages for breach of a warranty a plea which avers that the parties had.agreed to settle by arbitration any differences arising from the transaction is bad1 because the averred agreement is an attempt to settle by arbitration the right to maintain an action for breach of contract and thus oust the courts of their jurisdiction.</p> <p>2. In an action for damages for breach of an implied warranty that a certain feeding stuff sold to plaintiff did not contain Rice Hulls, pleas averring that the commodity was sold to the plaintiff under a complete description and specification and that the goods met in every particular the description and specification set forth in the contract of sale set up a good defense.</p> <p>3. There' is no implication of warranty in conflict with the express terms of the agreement.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court of appeals erred in failing to consider alternative basis asserted by the appellee to support its attorney’s fees award
- holding that the court of appeals erred in failing to consider an alternative basis asserted by the appellee to support its attorney’s fees award
- holding lower court’s opinion was incomplete in case involving former employee who was enjoined from competing with employer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.