Stein v. Willingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that use of an economic consultant’s report in the amended 21 complaint and on appeal waived the right to object to disclosure of the report’s contents
• “Since the respondent has agreed to provide the requested discovery, the motion to compel has been mooted..”
• “Where the party responding to the motion agrees to provide the discovery requested, a motion to compel becomes moot.”
• “Where the party responding to the motion agrees to provide the discovery requested, a motion to compel becomes moot.”
• “If a party objects to discovery requests, that party bears the burden of showing why discovery should be denied.”
• “Both the attorney-client and work product privileges may be waived if a party puts the privileged communication at issue by relying on it to support a claim.” (citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 219 F.3d 175, 191 (2d Cir. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).