Stein v. Stein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding attack was collateral because party “had an adequate opportunity to challenge th[e] . . . order via an appeal” but failed to
• “[Collateral] attacks are permissible only when a party can show that the court issuing the order sought to be enforced lacked jurisdiction to issue the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Town of Pawlet v. Daniel Banyai
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2024-03-01· cited 15×
• Bergman v. Marker
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-12-21· cited 6×
• Adamson v. Dodge
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-08-24· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Marriage of Williams
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-08-10· cited 63×
• National Labor Relations Board v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
  Second Circuit· 1970-05-18· cited 52×
• Jessen v. Jessen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-06-09· cited 40×
• Lerman v. Lerman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-04-30· cited 20×
• Wursthaus, Inc. v. Cerreta
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-11· cited 17×
• Agway, Inc. v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-11-21· cited 12×
• Hixson v. Plump
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-10-24· cited 6×
• Callaert v. Callaert
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-05· cited 2×