Skip to main content
· 3/6/2007

Stein v. Gelfand

Citations

  • 476 F. Supp. 2d 427
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16110
  • 2007 WL 700823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment to defendant on plaintiff’s promissory estoppel claim, in part because the plaintiff “could not reasonably have relied upon” a “brief conversation” that “left for future resolution so many key terms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.