Stein v. C. & O. Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]tate law cannot be used to fill what private litigants perceive to be gaps in the regulatory requirements imposed by federal law.”
• citation and internal 4 The Court will assume without deciding that the availability of emotional distress damages meets the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.§ 1332(a)(1). ; quotation marks omitted
• plaintiffs had standing because they would not have purchased defendant’s bottled water or paid a premium for it if they had known it was municipaltap water instead of 100% natural spring water as marketed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).