District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/13/1984
Steil v. FLA. PHYSICIANS'INS. RECIPROCAL
Citations
- 448 So. 2d 589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a settlement may not be enforced against the carrier if it is unreasonable in amount or tainted by bad faith, and adopting the two-part inquiry
- holding that in a case involving a consent judgment, a settle- ment can be enforced against the insurer so long as it is not “unreasonable in amount or tainted by bad faith”
- holding same and noting the general rule that where an insurer refuses to defend, its insured may obtain a reasonable settlement despite policy language to the contrary
- “By refusing to defend Steil’s claim, the carrier left Walker to his own devices to protect himself in the best way possible.”
- dynamics of Miller-Shugart settlements make settlement amount more suspect than in other consent settlements because a defendant with little to lose may agree to an inflated judgment amount in order to avoid personal liability
- suspicion of collusion and fraud led court to deny effect to settlement and assignment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grimes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erika L. McNamara v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2022-04-05· cited 478×
- American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court· 1994-06-08· cited 312×
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanySixth Circuit· 1995-07-17· cited 189×
- Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-09-28· cited 151×
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 106×
- Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-03-29· cited 103×
- Perera v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-05-06· cited 86×
- Chaussee v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-06-27· cited 77×
- Gulf Insurance Co. v. Noble BroadcastSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-01-21· cited 64×
- Miller v. ByrneColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-10-05· cited 63×
- Gainsco Insurance Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court· 2002-08-19· cited 53×
- Campione v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-02-27· cited 53×
- Vernon Gray v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.D.C. Circuit· 1989-04-04· cited 51×
- First American v. Nat. Union Fire Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-11· cited 43×
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wheelwright Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-11-27· cited 39×
- Kagele v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-04· cited 36×
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Royal Crane, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-10· cited 36×
- Gallagher v. DupontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-09· cited 34×
- Sinni v. Scottsdale InsuranceM.D. Florida· 2010-01-04· cited 31×
- Wachovia Ins. Services, Inc. v. ToomeySupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-29· cited 28×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-03-12· cited 303×
- Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-02-22· cited 175×
- Ralph E. Coblentz, as Administrator, D.B.N. Of the Estate of Edward Thomas Coblentz, Deceased v. American Surety Company of New YorkFifth Circuit· 1969-10-10· cited 127×
- Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court· 1964-02-28· cited 88×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-04-10· cited 82×
- Stubblefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 60×
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. KivelaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-08-12· cited 59×
- Zander v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1968-03-05· cited 41×
- Bendall v. WhiteN.D. Alabama· 1981-04-23· cited 30×
- FLORIDA FARM BUR. MUT. INS. v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-27· cited 29×
- Cunningham v. Austin Ford, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-07-12· cited 16×
- AMERICAN CAS. CO. OF PENN. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1963-01-18· cited 15×
- Phoenix Assurance Co. of New York v. Hendry Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-09-27· cited 11×
- Fidelity and Cas. Co. of New York v. CopeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.