Steginsky v. Xcelera Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court “properly applied an identical standard” to a default judgment motion and a Rule 12(b)6
• holding the district court properly applied the same standard for a motion to dismiss against one party and for a default judgment against another
• adopting Whitman and finding the “duty springs from federal law, and that looking to idiosyncratic differences in state law would thwart the goal- of promoting national uniformity in securities markets”
• under both a motion to dismiss and a motion for default, the plaintiff must proffer well-pleaded allegations
• “The district court properly applied an identical standard in assessing the two motions [for default judgment and dismissal] and accepted all of the complaint’s factual allegations as true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).