Steering Committee v. Washington Group International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an argument made in plaintiffs’ reply brief but not in their opening brief waived
• “The relevant inquiry ... is whether the Corps approved sufficiently precise specifications, such that it is evident that the government was the primary agent of decision over the compaction method.”
• “That argument is waived, because it was not made in the plaintiffs’ opening brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).