Steere v. Hoagland
Citations
- 39 Ill. 264
Syllabus
<p>1. Creditors’ bills—in what cases may be filed, when execution has not issued. As a general rule, there must he a judgment, and an execution returned unsatisfied, before a-creditor’s bill ivill he entertained; hut there are exceptions to this rule. In proceedings against insolvent estates, an execution is not essential to give the court jurisdiction, and under our statute an execution cannot issue against an administrator so as to reach personal assets. In such cases, a resort to equity may he had without suing out execution.</p> <p>2. Chancery—may be resorted to in the first instance, when the fund cannot be reached at law. When a fund cannot he reached at law, and is only accessible to a court of chancery, and the debtor is dead, creditors may resort to equity in the first instance; and especially so when the estate is insolvent.</p> <p>3. Creditor’s bill—will not lie in State court, on a judgment obtained in the federal court. A judgment obtained in the United States court, being the adjudication of the court of another jurisdiction, our courts will not recognize such proceedings, as the basis upon which to afford relief.</p> <p>4. Same—will lie on justice's judgment. A justice’s judgment is a sufficient foundation for a creditor’s bill, if the amount is large enough to confer jurisdiction on the court.</p> <p>5. Sale. When A claimed to have sold a stock of goods to B, and the proof was, that such purchase was n'ot an absolute one, but that B simply became a partner, and secretly held two-thirds of the stock in trust for A and his partner; held, that such sale was fraudulent, and designed to hinder and delay creditors in the collection of their demands.</p>
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mosier v. NortonIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-09-15· cited 29×
- Dilworth v. CurtsIllinois Supreme Court· 1891-11-24· cited 27×
- Patterson v. LyndeIllinois Supreme Court· 1884-11-17· cited 26×
- Moss v. McCallIllinois Supreme Court· 1874-09-15· cited 25×
- Blair v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1896-01-20· cited 20×
- Houston v. MadduxIllinois Supreme Court· 1899-04-17· cited 20×
- Peterson v. GittingsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1899-01-24· cited 14×
- Heinrich v. HarriganIllinois Supreme Court· 1919-04-15· cited 12×
- French v. GibbsIllinois Supreme Court· 1883-01-31· cited 9×
- Groch v. StengerIllinois Supreme Court· 1872-09-15· cited 5×
- Hatch v. Bancroft-Thompson Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan· 1895-05-10· cited 5×
- Corn v. GreenbergAppellate Court of Illinois· 1913-06-30· cited 3×
- Smith v. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-06-20· cited 1×
- Thompson v. YatesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1895-12-12· cited 1×
- Danforth v. McIntyreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1882-09-26
- Austin v. BrunerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1896-06-18
- Ladd v. JudsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1897-09-13
- Houston v. MadduxAppellate Court of Illinois· 1898-01-17
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Steere v. Hoagland
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.