· 11/1/1989
Steen v. County Council of Sussex County
Citations
- 576 A.2d 642
- 1989 Del. Ch. LEXIS 149
- 1989 WL 211207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While it is clear that the grant of a Conditional Use Permit is not the same as a rezoning, such decisions in Sussex County, as previously indicated, must be treated as a rezoning for purposes of review by this Court.”
- “This Court’s role in reviewing a zoning decision of the County Counsil is limited to a review of the record to ascertain . . . that the decision is supported by substantial evidence and that it is not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.