Skip to main content
· 11/1/1989

Steen v. County Council of Sussex County

Citations

  • 576 A.2d 642
  • 1989 Del. Ch. LEXIS 149
  • 1989 WL 211207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While it is clear that the grant of a Conditional Use Permit is not the same as a rezoning, such decisions in Sussex County, as previously indicated, must be treated as a rezoning for purposes of review by this Court.”
  • “This Court’s role in reviewing a zoning decision of the County Counsil is limited to a review of the record to ascertain . . . that the decision is supported by substantial evidence and that it is not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.