Steen & Marshall v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[t]hese clear contractual provi- sions [requiring proof by a preponderance of the evi- dence] were ignored, not interpreted, by the arbitrator so [the court] did not substitute its interpretation of the contract for that of the arbitrator’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).