Steelman v. Lind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that police officer assumed normal risks inherent in helping motorist and could not recover from motorist who required aid for injuries sustained when another car hit officer
• concluding that police officer assumed normal risks inherent in helping motorist and could not recover from motorist who required aid for injuries sustained when another ear hit officer
• holding that a highway patrol officer “cannot base a tort claim upon damage caused by the very risk that he is paid to encounter and with which he is trained to cope”
• stating that the origins of the rule stem from the duty owed by an owner or occupier of land to one who enters upon the land
• stating that the origins of the rule stem from the duty owed by an owner or occupier of land to one who enters upon the land
• stating that whether the negligence which causes the officer's injury is the reason for his or her presence determines whether the FFR bars the officer's negligence action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).