Skip to main content
· 2/11/1999

Steele v. Employment Department

Citations

  • 328 Or. 292
  • 974 P.2d 207
  • 1999 Ore. LEXIS 69

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘We defer to a state agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, unless the interpretation is arbitrary or capricious.”
  • “We defer to a state agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, unless the interpretation is arbitrary or capricious.”
  • “[F]ederal courts owe no deference to state agency’s interpretation of federal law that they are not charged with enforcing.”
  • “We defer to a state agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, unless the interpretation is arbitrary or capricious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Durham, Gillette, Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.