· 2/11/1999
Steele v. Employment Department
Citations
- 328 Or. 292
- 974 P.2d 207
- 1999 Ore. LEXIS 69
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘We defer to a state agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, unless the interpretation is arbitrary or capricious.”
- “We defer to a state agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, unless the interpretation is arbitrary or capricious.”
- “[F]ederal courts owe no deference to state agency’s interpretation of federal law that they are not charged with enforcing.”
- “We defer to a state agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, unless the interpretation is arbitrary or capricious.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Durham, Gillette, Hoomissen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.