Steele v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the condition of a claimant’s injured eye must be analyzed. without reference to the possible beneficial effect of a contact lens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fashion Prints v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-03· cited 13×
• Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc. v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-19· cited 9×
• Thiele, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-19· cited 6×
• Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Fichtorn)
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-15· cited 4×
• Warr v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-09-01· cited 2×
• Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-31· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aluminum Co. of America v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-15· cited 25×
• Hershey Estates v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-08-02· cited 24×
• Stachowski v. Incorporated Real Estate Investors
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-11· cited 13×
• Cole Steel Equipment Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-24· cited 12×
• Commercial Laundry, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-29· cited 6×