Steele v. Benjamin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding inmate’s complaint that the Department’s application of biannual parole review to him constituted an ex post -facto violation implicated a protected liberty interest which warranted judicial review under the APA
• stating “Sullivan seems to imply that a quantitative analysis of the liberty interest must be conducted” when determining whether the ALJD has subject matter jurisdiction over non-collateral matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).