Steele County v. Erskine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “where the same factual basis is used to make both defamation and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims, and where a qualified privilege applies to the publication, as a matter of law Plaintiffs’ negligence claim cannot survive. ”
• “‘[t]he Congress clearly did not preempt the field’ in enacting the TILA, as ‘the substantive law of the state is preserved intact.’” (quoting Mason v. Gen. Fin. of Virginia, 542 F.2d 1226 (4th Cir. 1976))
• aff’d without opinion, 745 F.2d 43 (1st Cir. 1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).