Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parent company had sufficient rights in the patent to confer standing, where the owner of the patent was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent and the subsidiary exclusively permitted the parent to practice and assert the patent
• “[T]he plaintiff’s choice of forum is entitled to significantly less weight where the forum has no connection with the matter in controversy.”
• “[T]he plaintiff’s choice of forum is entitled to significantly less weight where the forum has no connection with the matter in controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).