Steed v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that self-reported limitations on standing, sitting, and lifting were belied by activities such as housework, caring for a child, cooking, and driving
• finding that mild, minimal, and normal objective medical records can support an RFC without medical opinion evidence with regard to work-related restrictions
• concluding fact that medical evidence was silent regarding work- related restrictions “should not be held against the ALJ when there is medical evidence that supports the ALJ’s decision”
• affirming the denial of disability benefits, in part, because diagnostic tests and exams came back “normal” or showed “minimal” problems
• upholding the Commissioner’s decision where the claimant admitted that the “medical evidence” was “silent” regarding her “work-related restrictions”
• affirming the denial of disability benefits, in part, because diagnostic tests and exams came back “normal” or showed “minimal” problems

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).