· 4/5/2005
Stechler v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.
Citations
- 382 F. Supp. 2d 580
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5720
- 2005 WL 774264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering tax strategy as a whole to ascertain whether it involved purchase and sale of securities
- characterizing misrepresentations relating to the value of a security as a generally sufficient, but not necessary, condition for satisfying the in-connection-with requirement
- determining “[wjhether the Digital Options are securities ultimately turns on these issues of fact” not appropriately resolved on a motion to dismiss
- declining to find “intertwined-ness” when the signatory’s claims against non-signatory did not “aris[e] out of,” were not “integrally related to,” and did not “make reference to or presume the existence of” the underlying contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.