Skip to main content
· 4/5/2005

Stechler v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.

Citations

  • 382 F. Supp. 2d 580
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5720
  • 2005 WL 774264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering tax strategy as a whole to ascertain whether it involved purchase and sale of securities
  • characterizing misrepresentations relating to the value of a security as a generally sufficient, but not necessary, condition for satisfying the in-connection-with requirement
  • determining “[wjhether the Digital Options are securities ultimately turns on these issues of fact” not appropriately resolved on a motion to dismiss
  • declining to find “intertwined-ness” when the signatory’s claims against non-signatory did not “aris[e] out of,” were not “integrally related to,” and did not “make reference to or presume the existence of” the underlying contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.