Stebbins v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he application of [Rule 9(b) ] must not abrogate the concept of notice pleading”
• discussing RICO, particularity requirement under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), and concept of notice pleading
• affirming denial of summary judgment; plaintiffs offered evidence of pattern with two related schemes to market fraudulent tax shelters, and schemes’ similarity presented jury question; “use of business instructional video cassette tapes” deemed significant
• affirming denial of summary judgment; plaintiffs offered evidence of pattern with two related schemes to market fraudulent tax shelters, and schemes’ similarity presented jury question; “use of business instructional video cassette tapes” deemed significant
• discussing RICO, particularity requirement under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), and concept of notice pleading
• the discovery rule applicable to claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).