Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting trial court’s decision in Stebbins v. Doncas- ters, Inc., 47 Conn. Supp. 638, 820 A.2d 1137 (2002)
• violation of safety rules and regulations did not necessarily mean that “the defendant believed that its conduct was substantially certain to cause [injury to employees]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lucenti v. Laviero
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-01-18· cited 35×
• Sullivan v. Lake Compounce Theme Park, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-02-07· cited 31×
• Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-16· cited 26×
• Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Co.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-09-04· cited 14×
• Martinez v. Southington Metal Fabricating Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-19· cited 13×
• Motzer v. Haberli
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-04-26· cited 13×
• Brouillard v. Connecticut Siting Council
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-28· cited 7×
• Mattera v. Civil Service Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-04-05· cited 6×
• Thomas v. State
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-02· cited 4×
• Stash v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-29· cited 4×
• Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-06-28· cited 4×
• Bye v. Cianbro Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 2013-06-24· cited 2×
• Hassiem v. O and G Industries, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-06-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 817×
• Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-05· cited 108×
• Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. Wysocki
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-11-11· cited 23×