Skip to main content
· 10/4/2010

Steam Sales Corp. v. Summers

Citations

  • 937 N.E.2d 715
  • 344 Ill. Dec. 692
  • 405 Ill. App. 3d 442
  • 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 770
  • 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 1061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “this district is no longer committed to a strict application of the two restrictive prongs of the legitimate-business-interest test”
  • restrictive covenant with no geographic limitation was enforceable because the former employee was barred only from soliciting and servicing customers who had worked with the former employer during the previous two years
  • “a careful reading of the three opinions in this case makes clear that this district is no longer committed to a strict application of the two restrictive prongs of the legitimate-business-interest test”
  • “I share the dissent’s concern regarding the viability of the legitimate-business-interest test”
  • “we apply it [the LBI test] here”
  • finding covenant reasonable and enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.