Skip to main content
· 3/20/2019

Stavrum v. Tudor

Citations

  • 439 P.3d 506
  • 296 Or. App. 534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that FAR 15.305(b) governs an agency’s decision to cancel a solicitation
  • finding that FAR 15.305(b) applied, but was not violated, where an agency cancelled a solicitation after determining that “the acquisition strategy had failed to result in proposals that met the government's needs for the project” (emphasis added)
  • “having concluded that cancellation of the solicitation was not improper, the court has no occasion to reach the plaintiffs’ arguments that the agency should have taken additional or different steps in evaluating the proposals—the proper cancellation essentially mooted those claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.