Skip to main content
· 2/26/1996

Staub v. Boeing Co.

Citations

  • 919 F. Supp. 366
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 323
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6926
  • 1996 WL 115453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the regulations only recommend an interactive process
  • Boeing reasonably accommodated Staub when it conducted enormous internal effort, but was ultimately unsuccessful in identifying vacant jobs that could accommodate Staub’s physical limitations
  • finding frivolous a claim that the ADA affords a right to have counsel present at an inter- nal meeting to discuss an employee’s future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coughenour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.