· 9/26/1961
States v. Peisner
Citations
- 198 F. Supp. 67
- 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if the objecting party “makes only conclusory or general objections, ... the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error” (internal citations omitted)
- holding that if the objecting party “makes only conclusory or general objections, ... the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error” (internal citations omitted)
- holding that if the objecting party “makes only conclusory or general objections, . . . the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error”
- holding that if the objecting party “makes only conclusory or general objections, ... the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error” (internal citations omitted)
- holding that if the objecting party “makes only conclusory or general objections, . . . the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error”
- holding that if the objecting party “makes only conclusory or general objections, . . . the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.