Skip to main content
· 5/8/1970

States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Philippine Air Lines, a Corporation, and Qantas Airways, a Corporation

Citations

  • 426 F.2d 803
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 255
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming “[t]hat a court has power to dismiss 25 an action for want of prosecution on its own motion, both under Rule 41 (b), Fed. R. Civ. P., or under its local rule, or even in the absence of such rules, is settled in this circuit”
  • affirming “[t]hat a court has power to dismiss an action for want of prosecution on 3 its own motion, both under Rule 41 (b), F.R. Civ. P., or under its local rule, or even in the 4 absence of such rules, is settled in this circuit”
  • affirming “[t]hat □ 25 court has power to dismiss an action for want of prosecution on its own motion, both unde Rule 41 (b), Fed. R. Civ. P., or under its local rule, or even in the absence of such rules, 1 settled in this circuit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madden, Claims, Duniway, Kilkenny

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.