Staten v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While there are no set standards for determination of indigency on appeal, the court is to look at the individual’s financial status and not that of relatives or other sources.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rosales v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-12-09· cited 63×
• Newman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-06· cited 38×
• in Re Joanne Wilkie (Brochstein) Mancha
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-09-06· cited 30×
• Sparkman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-08-09· cited 29×
• In Re Luebe
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-01-21· cited 12×
• Taylor v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1990-10-25· cited 8×
• Patti Whitehead v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-10-31
• Arron Joshua Castillo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-02-25

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abdnor v. Ovard
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-20· cited 37×
• Barber v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-10-27· cited 27×
• Zanghetti v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-20· cited 17×
• Warminski v. Dear
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-15· cited 12×